Mike Malloy

[TruthIsAll]

Coakley won the Hand Counts

So why is no one calling for a full recount of the optiscan ballots?

http://electionfraudblog.com/2010/bipartisanly-yours-coakley-won-the-hand-counts/

According to preliminary media results by municipality, Democrat Martha Coakley won Massachusetts overall in its hand counted locations,* with 51.12% of the vote (32,247 hand counted votes) to Brown’s 30,136, which garnered him 47.77% of hand counted votes. But this is nothing new. As a point of reference, however, in the Maine gay marriage issue recently there was no significant overall difference between machine count and hand count locations.

Obama won the handcounts in the New Hampshire primary by exactly the same margin that Clinton won the machine counts. It was just like the caucuses, where humans were counted- Obama won all of them easily. In 2004, there was a 2% exit poll discrepancy in handcounted paper ballot precincts, 7% in electronic voting machines (DREs and optical scanners), 6% in punched card and 12% in mechanical lever precincts (NY and CT voted 100% using levers).

Now, about the 2008 primaries. Focus on Super Tuesday. Check out MA.

http://www.electionmathematics.org/em-exitpolls/SuperTuesday2008DemPrimary.pdf

BUT THERE WAS NO EXIT POLL IN THE 2010 MA SENATE RACE. I WONDER WHY.The pattern is consistent: Democrats win elections when humans count the votes in full view. They lose when machines count and there is no paper to prove if they actually won or lost. They could re-count the optical scanner ballots in MA if they wanted to. But the Dems never want to -except for Al Franken. And you know what happened in MN.